Degrees vs Radians vs Gradians: Which is better and why?
Think degrees are a fundamental law of physics? Think again. The 360° circle isn’t woven into the fabric …
Geometric insights into radians versus degrees, pi calculations, and reimagining the quadratic formula.
This subject revisits standard algebraic equations and trigonometric angle systems from fresh, intuitive angles.
The classic quadratic equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ has roots:
$$ x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} $$However, when $a \to 0$ (nearly linear equations), numerical cancellation error occurs in the numerator. By dividing the equation by $x^2$ and substituting $u = 1/x$, we obtain $c u^2 + b u + a = 0$. Solving for $u$ and inverting gives:
$$ x = \frac{2c}{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}} $$This dual formulation is numerically stable for small $a$ and reveals a direct relationship with Vieta’s formulas:
$$ x_1 + x_2 = -\frac{b}{a}, \qquad x_1 x_2 = \frac{c}{a} $$A degree ($1^\circ$) is defined arbitrarily as $1/360$ of a full rotation, rooted in ancient Babylonian sexagesimal calendars.
In contrast, the radian is the mathematically pure ratio of arc length $s$ to radius $r$:
$$ \theta = \frac{s}{r} \quad [\text{dimensionless ratio}] $$Because of this definition, calculus derivatives take their purest form without scaling factors:
$$ \frac{d}{d\theta} \sin(\theta) = \cos(\theta) \quad (\text{only valid when } \theta \text{ is in radians}) $$Think degrees are a fundamental law of physics? Think again. The 360° circle isn’t woven into the fabric …
What happens when you multiply an infinite, non-repeating decimal by itself? With numbers like the square root …
In high school math, the quadratic formula is drilled into our brains like a sacred nursery rhyme: $x = …